Nandini VS Amul row: Reputed dairy co-ops caught in ‘political talks’ may suffer brand erosion, warns market watchers
The Hindu
From a brand perspective, the world is your oyster and therefore, an Amul can sell in Bengaluru just as a Nandini can sell in Anand. However, the Nandini-Amul war, triggered recently by the political fraternity, is certainly not a war for a free market or healthy competition, and if left to continue, two largest dairies in the country (Gujarat Milk Marketing Federation’s Amul with a turnover of ₹72,000 crore and Karnataka Milk Federation’s Nandini with ₹25,000 crore) may suffer irreparable brand erosion, cautioned industry observers.
From a brand perspective, the world is your oyster and therefore, an Amul can sell in Bengaluru just as a Nandini can sell in Anand.
However, the Nandini-Amul war, triggered recently by the political fraternity, is certainly not a war for a free market or healthy competition, and if left to continue, two largest dairies in the country (Gujarat Milk Marketing Federation’s Amul with a turnover of ₹72,000 crore and Karnataka Milk Federation’s Nandini with ₹25,000 crore) may suffer irreparable brand erosion, cautioned industry observers.
The fact is Amul has been selling some of its products including milk (cartons), butter, cheese, paneer, ice cream, curds etc. in Karnataka for several decades, but its “utterly butterly” chemistry turned “bitterly’‘ when there was a sort of ‘political intervention’ to install Amul as a competition brand in the State formally, they pointed out.
V. Balakrishnan, Chairman Exfinity Ventures, a venture capital firm, and former CFO, Infosys told The Hindu, “India is a free market economy and everyone is entitled to sell anywhere in the country. The problem comes when politicians try to take sides and push for a particular product and that too during election time. It is sad that the whole issue now takes a political colour and real reasoning takes a back seat.’‘
The air war between Nandini and Amul was also due to a lack of trust between the Centre and State governments as the regional parties thought that the Centre has been trying to roughshod them and promote agendas that were inimical to the State’s interest, Mr. Balakrishnan opined.
“This is an election issue today. It is ‘Rotti, bhattey, maney and haalu’ politics at play. Even this shall ebb out post May 13,’‘ commented Harish Bijoor, a brand expert and CEO of a boutique consulting firm, Harish Bijoor Consults.
The Nandini-Amul debate is a needless one and it’s udder, butter and milk politics at its best, or at its worst. It’s election time and any possibility of controversy is embraced by the political class, as per Mr. Bijoor.
The Opposition Congress demanded that the government open the Gandhi Vatika Museum, depicting Mahatma Gandhi’s legacy and freedom struggle, built at a cost of ₹85 crore in Jaipur’s Central Park last year, during the Congress-led regime in Rajasthan. The museum has not been opened to the public, reportedly because of the administration’s engagements with the State Assembly and Lok Sabha elections.
Almaya Munnettam (Lay People to the Fore), group in the Ernakulam-Angamaly Archdiocese of the Syro-Malabar Church opposed to the synod-recommended Mass, rejected a circular issued by Major Archbishop Raphael Thattil and apostolic administrator Bosco Puthur on June 9 to implement the unified Mass in the archdiocese from July 3.
Pakistan coach Gary Kirsten stated that “not so great decision making” contributed to his side’s defeat to India in the Group-A T20 World Cup clash here on Sunday. The batting unit came apart in the chase, after being well placed at 72 for two. With 48 runs needed from eight overs, Pakistan found a way to panic and lose. “Maybe not so great decision making,” Kirsten said at the post-match press conference, when asked to explain the loss.