Key prosecutor in Trump’s classified documents case takes the Fifth in House Judiciary deposition

A key federal prosecutor in the classified documents case against President Donald Trump declined to answer questions during a House Judiciary Committee deposition Wednesday, invoking his Fifth Amendment right as a spokesperson suggested the government had been weaponized against him.

A key federal prosecutor in the classified documents case against President Donald Trump declined to answer questions during a House Judiciary Committee deposition Wednesday, invoking his Fifth Amendment right as a spokesperson suggested the government had been weaponized against him. Jay Bratt is a former Justice Department national security prosecutor who spearheaded the case in which Trump was charged with taking classified national defense documents from the White House after he left office and resisting the government’s attempts to retrieve the materials. He entered the committee room Wednesday morning, and two sources familiar with the matter confirmed he invoked his Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination. He left after a little less than two hours. “This administration and its proxies have made no effort to hide their willingness to weaponize the machinery of government against those they perceive as political enemies” Bratt spokesperson Peter Carr said in a statement to CNN. “That should alarm every American who believes in the rule of law. In light of these undeniable and deeply troubling circumstances, Mr. Bratt has no choice but to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights.” Bratt retired from the Justice Department in January 2025. Carr worked as a Justice Department and Special Counsel spokesman before he was fired by the Trump administration last month. Invoking the Fifth Amendment is typically done to avoid answering specific questions. Though it can be perceived by the public as a way of avoiding accountability, the US Supreme Court has long regarded the right against self-incrimination as a venerable part of the Constitution and, in legal proceedings, tried to ensure that a witness’ silence not be viewed as evidence of guilt. GOP Rep. Andy Biggs, who was in Bratt’s deposition, told CNN, “he’s not saying a lot.”