
Justices 'completely confused' during arguments in Section 230 case against Google that could reshape internet
Fox News
The first of the week's two cases before the Supreme Court involving Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act left justices at times confused over what was being argued.
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act says sites like YouTube, Google, Facebook and Twitter are immune to legal claims based on the content posted by their users. The justices and parties involved wrestled with whether the way in which that content is presented is itself a form of speech and whether it is via clear recommendations or an algorithm. Ronn Blitzer is a reporter for Fox News Digital covering politics and breaking news.
At times, the issues and arguments got a bit murky, pushing even the justices to the point of confusion.

FBI director suggests 'sheer incompetence' or 'negligence' in Biden admin handling of pipe bomb case
FBI Director Kash Patel criticizes Biden administration for failing to solve U.S. Capitol pipe bomb case for four years before Brian Cole Jr. was arrested.












