How women reacted to Delhi High Court’s split verdict on marital rape
India Today
The Delhi High Court delivered a split verdict on Wednesday on a batch of petitions seeking to make marital rape a crime. While one of the judges favoured striking down the provision of the law that provides exemption, the other held it was not unconstitutional.
On the hotly-debated question of criminalising marital rape, the Delhi High Court delivered a split verdict on Wednesday. The court was hearing a batch of petitions challenging an exception under rape laws that exempts men who have non-consensual sex with their wives from criminal prosecution if the woman is not a minor.
While Justice Shakdher, who headed the division bench, favoured striking down the marital rape exception for being "unconstitutional" and said it would be "tragic if a married woman's call for justice is not heard even after 162 years" since the enactment of IPC, Justice Shankar said the exception under the rape law is not "unconstitutional and was based on an intelligible differentia".
Reacting to the court’s verdict, activist Ratnaboli Ray said, “As an activist I feel outraged by this comment by a judge. This constant and forceful negation to acknowledge marital rape as a crime, the legal system reiterates that it is a wife's duty to have sex with her husband. This also reminds us that women's consent, which at the heart of right to life, autonomy and bodily integrity can be signed away with the institution of marriage.”
ALSO READ | After Delhi HC's split verdict on marital rape, petitioners to move Supreme Court
Speaking to India Today, Sreemoyee Piu Kundu, an author, also said that women need to have autonomy over their bodies.
“Any act of sexual nature which doesn’t involve the implicit consent of a woman constitutes rape. The laws on rape have been amended and today, if a woman changes her mind midway during sex, then it is considered rape if the man still imposes and forces himself upon her,” Sremoyee Piu Kundu said.
She added, “India should immediately criminalize marital rape. This association of providing sex to the husband as one of the duties of a wife is not just regressive, but also barbaric. And justifying it through religion, because marriage has a social and religious context, and saying that it is the ‘dharma’ of the wife to provide sex to the husband is absolutely prehistoric and barbaric. Women should have autonomy over their bodies and complete agency over what they wish to be done to them.
The Supreme Court was hearing West Bengal's objections to the maintainability of the ED plea filed under Article 32. The ED has sought a CBI probe into the alleged obstruction of its raids on I-PAC by Mamata Banerjee and her government.
While investigating, the police learnt that the gang lured victims with attractive social media advertisements and later duped them of a significant amount of money.
Harish Rana, India's 1st person to be allowed passive euthanasia, dies in AIIMS Delhi after 13 years in coma
The three were convicted earlier for their involvement in activities linked to Dukhtaran-e-Millat (DeM), a banned organisation that sought the secession of Jammu and Kashmir from India. It was founded by Andrabi.
PM Modi, in his Lok Sabha address, had urged unity and preparedness, warning that the conflict could have long-term global and economic impacts.
Lalu Yadav had argued that the FIR, the probe and the chargesheets in the land-for-job case were legally unsustainable, claiming that the CBI had not obtained prior sanction.
From a record outlay to a sweeping green push, Rekha Gupta lays out Delhi's roadmap with big allocations across sectors, while key claims and ambitious targets set the tone for the year ahead.
Proposed changes to the transgender law trigger outrage over exclusion, mandatory certification, and the rollback of self-identification rights.
India's artillery strength sees a steady build-up with new Pinaka regiments, but the bigger plan points to a much larger force and more advanced systems in the coming years.
MK Stalin attacks PM Modi's 'be prepared' remark, questions if the Centre is ready to protect citizens amid the West Asia crisis.