
HC rejects PIL plea seeking directions to EC to create voter awareness on NOTA option
The Hindu
A Division Bench of Justices Ravindra V. Ghuge and R.M. Joshi noted that the petitioner, Suhas Wankhede, a PhD student, had filed a similar PIL plea earlier. In this PIL, Mr. Wankhede prayed that the EC should appoint a brand ambassador and start a campaign for NOTA.
The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court had dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) petition on March 22 seeking directions to the Election Commission (EC) to create awareness among the public about the ‘None of the Above’ (NOTA) option in electronic voting machines (EVM). A copy of the judgment was made public on April 1.
Rejecting the plea, the Bench said the EC and the Maharashtra State Election Commission had taken enough steps to create awareness about the NOTA option in EVMs.
A Division Bench of Justices Ravindra V. Ghuge and R.M. Joshi noted that the petitioner, Suhas Wankhede, a PhD student, had filed a similar PIL plea earlier. In this PIL, Mr. Wankhede prayed that the EC should appoint a brand ambassador and start a campaign for NOTA.
The court referred to the previous PIL plea filed by the same petitioner in which a detailed order was passed on October 14, 2019, and said the issues raised by the petitioner had already been addressed by the Supreme Court in the People’s Union for Civil Liberties case. The Supreme Court had directed the EC to include the NOTA option in EVMs and undertake awareness programmes to educate the masses.
The court said, “The long form of ‘NOTA’ is conspicuously mentioned in bold letters and catches the attention of the voter immediately. The instructions are also set out in bold letters that ‘NOTA’ is available as the last option in the electronic voting machine.”
“We find that the Election Commission has already come out with a manual on Systematic Voters Education and Electoral Participation (SVEEP), which was published in July 2020. The SVEEP Strategy 2022-2025 (4) was also published. Having considered the above factors and the steps taken by the EC and the State Election Commission, and the fact that this petitioner had filed an identical petition earlier, this PIL petition is dismissed”, the court said.
The court order also elaborated on initiatives undertaken by the EC to raise awareness about NOTA. These initiatives included awareness programmes through mobile demonstration vans, electoral literacy programmes conducted at different locations, advertisements in leading national dailies, distribution of voter guides, and awareness activities after the last day of candidate withdrawal.

The Centre has rejected reports that the definition of the Aravalli hills was changed to permit large-scale mining, citing a Supreme Court-ordered freeze on new leases. It said a court-approved framework will bring over 90% of the Aravalli region under protected areas and strengthen safeguards against illegal mining. The clarification follows controversy over the “100-metre” criterion used to define hills across states.












