Explained: Why Virat Kohli's Dismissal Against KKR Wasn't A No-Ball

RCB batter Virat Kohli's dismissal against KKR triggered a huge debate about the waist-high no-ball rule in the game.

Royal Challengers Bengaluru superstar Virat Kohli found himself being dismissed in a manner that triggered a huge debate on social media as well as the cricketing fraternity. Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) pacer Harshit Rana bowled a full-toss that Kohli connected a little above his waist height and ended up giving a catch into the hands of the bowler. Yet, the umpires deemed Kohli out. The RCB star decided to review the matter but even that went in the favour of the bowling team. Though all the decisions went against RCB in that instance, not everyone is convinced that Virat deserved to be dismissed. According to the 3rd umpire, Virat Kohli was outside his crease.- It's a fair delivery or a No Ball according to you? pic.twitter.com/GkESFX73Nj

While many have blamed the umpires over Kohli's dismissal, first that has to be understood that the decision was purely from the technological standpoint as the RCB batter had decided to review the dismissal.

First of all, it has to be understood that an above waist height no-ball is only given when the ball reaches the batter, at the popping crease, above the height of the waist. In Virat's case, however, this wasn't the case.

Upon assessment, the third umpire deemed the delivery from Harshit Rana a fair delivery as Kohli was standing outside his crease. Even the impact between the ball and the bat was quite ahead of the body.