
Controversial statements over bus accident in Vijayawada’s PNBS put passengers, public in confusion
The Hindu
Controversial statements given by Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) officials and the bus driver over the bus accident in Pandit Nehru Bus Station (PNBS), created confusion among the passengers and the public. The air-conditioner Vijayawada-Guntur non-stop service, suddenly rammed into the bus station from Platform No.12 hitting the passengers sitting in the chairs, killing three persons and injuring two others, on November 6.
Controversial statements given by Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) officials and the bus driver over the bus accident in Pandit Nehru Bus Station (PNBS), created confusion among the passengers and the public.
The air-conditioner Vijayawada-Guntur non-stop service, suddenly rammed into the bus station from Platform No.12 hitting the passengers sitting in the chairs, killing three persons and injuring two others, on November 6.
Speaking to The Hindu, bus driver V. Prakasam said the condition of the bus was not good and there was a problem in the gear box, which I could not observe while taking the vehicle out of the Auto Nagar depot.
“I tried to apply reverse gear to go back, but the gear got struck. Then I tried to move a little forward, but the vehicle suddenly moved with a high speed, stepped up the platform and hit the chairs,” said sixty-year-old Prakasam.
However, APSRTC vice-chairman and managing director (VC&MD) Dwaraka Tirumala Rao said the condition of the Metro Luxury bus which caused the accident was good.
“The vehicle was in complete fit condition. An inquiry has been ordered and the exact reason for the accident could be known within 24-hours,” Mr. Tirumala Rao said.

The Centre has rejected reports that the definition of the Aravalli hills was changed to permit large-scale mining, citing a Supreme Court-ordered freeze on new leases. It said a court-approved framework will bring over 90% of the Aravalli region under protected areas and strengthen safeguards against illegal mining. The clarification follows controversy over the “100-metre” criterion used to define hills across states.












