
Big Law fights back against Trump’s retribution
CNN
In recent weeks, some of America’s most powerful law firms have faced a defining choice: do a deal with the White House, or prepare to fight severe restrictions President Donald Trump has placed on firms and lawyers he opposes politically.
In recent weeks, some of America’s most powerful law firms have faced a defining choice: do a deal with the White House, or prepare to fight severe restrictions President Donald Trump has placed on firms and lawyers he opposes politically. Facing potentially ruinous sanctions from Trump because of past or current work he opposes, two high-profile firms cut deals with the White House, fueling fears in some portions of the industry that Big Law would cave to Trump’s tactics, upending how large firms have done business for decades in Washington. But Friday morning, Jenner & Block, and WilmerHale, two large firms built around litigation and Washington contacts, sued the administration to challenge Trump executive orders targeting them and their clients. The firms accused the government of using unconstitutional executive orders to punish or chill speech it doesn’t like. The development was an encouraging shift for many lawyers agitating for the industry to stand up cohesively for the rule of law. The staying power of the pushback on Trump remains uncertain. Even if Trump’s orders are found unconstitutional, some lawyers fear damage to their business is already done because new clients may avoid firms that Trump has a grudge against. While some smaller firms have spoken out against the president’s orders, and even among conservatives the orders have raised constitutional concerns, many big firms have stayed silent hoping to avoid Trump’s wrath. Two separate judges later Friday issued temporary orders blocking parts of the Trump executive orders against the Jenner, and Wilmer firms, citing likely First Amendment violations. They join a third judge who blocked an earlier executive order against the firm Perkins Coie, which is challenging a similar order targeting it.

The aircraft used in the US military’s first strike on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean, a strike which has drawn intense scrutiny and resulted in numerous Congressional briefings, was painted as a civilian aircraft and was part of a closely guarded classified program, sources familiar with the program told CNN. Its use “immediately drew scrutiny and real concerns” from lawmakers, one of the sources familiar said, and legislators began asking questions about the aircraft during briefings in September.

DOJ pleads with lawyers to get through ‘grind’ of Epstein files as criticism of redactions continues
“It is a grind,” the head of the Justice Department’s criminal division said in an email. “While we certainly encourage aggressive overachievers, we need reviewers to hit the 1,000-page mark each day.”

A new classified legal opinion produced by the Justice Department argues that President Donald Trump was not limited by domestic law when approving the US operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro because of his constitutional authority as commander-in-chief and that he is not constrained by international law when it comes to carrying out law enforcement operations overseas, according to sources who have read the memo.

Former Navy sailor sentenced to 16 years for selling information about ships to Chinese intelligence
A former US Navy sailor convicted of selling technical and operating manuals for ships and operating systems to an intelligence officer working for China was sentenced Monday to more than 16 years in prison, prosecutors said.









